Canada v. George W. Bush - Trial of the Millennium : Thunderbay IMC

I again, near the end of your free time here, am asking for Americans to help
me protect our freedom as it pertains to the false allegations that have been
leveled against myself as a true living god by your seriously criminal demon
leader dictator, the truly evil, Mr. bush Jr.

Consider the value of my words that hold the last of my hope for Justice to
succeed with your love. God is truly great, but nobody at corporate control
will grant me to speak politely regarding the facts on our real suffering.
Please, do not forsake me as the North American people have been denied to
hear my simple arguments broadcasted.

These following two Motions I am sending you have been filed at the Court of
Queen's Bench here in Winnipeg, as a prelude to a Court challenge
unprecedented in our history. I am hoping I can interest you in realizing
that this challenge is not only important to me as a free citizen, but also
for ourselves as the concerned world community.

[the motions and affidavit have also gone to federal offices (Constitutional)
and the Provincal]

I continue to beg Americans to save the lives of their children by pleading on
their national radio broadcasts for the airing of my defense, but it would
seem, it's just to much trouble for anyone to care for.

Please, be Human, and call me for an interview.

Thanks for your consideration.

-----------------
AFFIDAVIT

AFFIDAVIT OF JOHNNY WIZARD

I, Johnny Wizard, in the city of Winnipeg, Province of Manitoba
MAKE OATH AND SAY:

1.

Pakistani ISI Director General Ahmad orders an aide to wire transfer about $100,000 to
hijacker Atta. Ahmad later resigns after the transfer is disclosed in India and confirmed
by the FBI. [Dawn, 10/8/01, Times of India, 10/9/01, Wall Street Journal, 10/10/01, AFP,
10/10/01] The individual who makes the wire transfer at Ahmad's direction is Saeed
Sheikh, later convinced for kidnapping and murdering reporter Daniel Pearl in February
2002. ABC News later reports, "federal authorities have told ABC News they've now
tracked more than $100,000 from banks in Pakistan to two banks in Florida to accounts
held by suspected hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta." [ABC News, 9/30/01] CNN also
reports the $100,000 transfer, and the New York Times specifies that it came in 2000.
[CNN, 10/1/01, CNN, 10/6/01, New York Times, 7/10/02] Ahmad's order must have
preceded June 2000, since that's when Atta and others started opening bank accounts and
receiving the money ($109,910 is received by Atta and Marwan Alshehhi between June
19 and September 18). [MSNBC, 12/11/01]

2.

On March 3, 2002, MSNBC's Jim Miklaszewski reported that he had received
anonymously, top secret presidential war strategy documents dated September 9th, 2001,
originating from Condolezza's office, outlining a strategy to invade Afghanistan premised
on blaming bin Laden a terrorist, but providing no evidence to back up the allegations,
thereby guaranteeing criminal invasion. Only workable if Laden pleads innocence to a
crime that hadn't yet taken place, a crime serious enough to "justify" sacrificing American
GIs truly for a liquefied natural gas pipe line for pension thieving Enron. ["The Dahbol
Working Group" and Bridas] Any evidence for any offense would have been sufficient to
have Muslim fundamentalists hand Laden immediately over, as they had offered [as others
of other nations had also] repeatedly during the Clinton years.

CBC and CNN have still, to this day, consciously refused to do any follow up on the
intelligence, deciding instead on behalf of dying people everywhere, our public
devolvement of a just society.

3.

RTÉ News - US rejects Taliban bin Laden evidence calls
21 September 2001 17:41

The White House has rejected requests from Afghanistan's ruling Taliban for proof that
Osama bin Laden was responsible for last week's attacks. According to the US Secretary
of State, Colin Powell, the United States has enough evidence to try bin Laden in an
American court.

The US Government said there would be no negotiations.

4.

[This following document was the official damning account]

Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States
4 October 2001
http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/page3554.asp

[This Internet Domain is Britain's Prime Minister's]

"This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Usama Bin Laden
in a court of law."

The document doesn’t hold ANY case, as that was the strategy.... See?

5.

Investigating the Investigation
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=17816

After playing a tape of Cheney's statement, Russert asked Daschle, "Did the vice president
call you and urge you not to investigate the events of Sept. 11?" Daschle flatly
contradicted Cheney: "Yes, he did, Tim, on Jan. 24, and then on Jan. 28 the president
himself at one of our breakfast meetings repeated the request."

...."[T]hat request was made" by Cheney not only on Jan. 24 and by Mr. Bush four days
later, but "on other dates following" as well.

6.

ABCNEWS.com : FBI Called off Terror Investigations
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers021219.html

Two veteran FBI investigators say they were ordered to stop investigations into a
suspected terror cell linked to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network and the Sept. 11
attacks...

`You Will Not Open Criminal Investigations'

7.

October 9 2001 - The Times of India

"While the Pakistani Inter Services Public Relations claimed that former ISI [the
"Pakistani CIA"] director-general Lt-Gen Mahmud Ahmad sought retirement after being
superseded on Monday, the truth is more shocking. Top sources confirmed here on
Tuesday that the general lost his job because of the "evidence" India produced to show his
links to one of the suicide bombers that wrecked the World Trade Center. The U.S.
authorities sought his removal after confirming the fact that $100,000 were wired to WTC
hijacker Mohammed Atta from Pakistan by Ahmad Umar Sheikh [Omar Saeed] at the
instance of General Mahmud [Ahmad]. Senior government sources have confirmed that
India contributed significantly to establishing the link between the money transfer and the
role played by the dismissed ISI chief. While they did not provide details, they said that
Indian inputs, including [Omar Saeed's] mobile phone number, helped the FBI in tracing
and establishing the link."

8.

No evidence was brought against Laden for nine eleven, none. [So according to Bush's
official top secret Presidential directives] While Laden himself claimed he played no
part in 911. Still, to save the lives of third worlders on the brink of starvation, Laden
agreed to hand himself over, but Bush refused the offer, while CBC and CNN denied
to report on that fact for the behalf of now dying dismembered American GIs. Once the
indiscriminate bombing began, targeting almost every building in the country of
Afghanistan, Laden then claimed he had no choice but to fight back to defend US
innocent from the ungodly enemies of Creation/Freedom. Then the clear to all fake
video came out with an actor who's face wasn't even close to looking remotely like Laden,
but for almost the facial hair. [Bridge of the Jamaican actor's nose is HALF as long in
proportion to Laden’s for example, and surely frightfully shocking for some, the actor
doesn't even take blame for 911 either!] Photos comparing the two faces never aired on
CBC and CNN available in about twelve seconds with the power of the Internet.

9.

former FBI deputy director and murder victim John O'Neill

"the main obstacles to investigating Islamic terrorism were U.S. oil corporate interests and
the role played by Saudi Arabia."

10.

Alex Jones interviewing Former German Defense Minister Andreas Von Buelow

"Bush signed W199I months before 911 ordering the FBI not to stop Al-Qaeda. They
threatened to arrest FBI agent Robert Wright if he tells us what he knows."

11.

Mr. Bush was quoted somewhere regarding Mr. Laden's guilt of complete innocence
with "We don't need any evidence, we know he's guilty."

12.

http://www.govexec.com/column/forwardTodaysColumn.cfm?sectionID=14

" [FBI's] Edmonds concluded that documents clearly showed that the Sept. 11 hijackers
were in the country and plotting to use airplanes as missiles. She said documents also
included information relating to their financial activities. "

13.

The honorable Argentinean oil company Bridas' relationship can not be understated
as the Bush Administration's primary motive on criminal invasion of Afghanistan to
save his biggest corporate backers, the American pension thieving Enron.

From "An American demands the truth from you" by Karl W. B. Schwarz

" I demand to know what energy companies were in that Cheney Energy Task Force
meeting and what discussions there were as to the steps that would be taken to remove the
Taliban and Bridas Corporation as the last remaining obstacle to the United States
controlling the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. I met that company in 1999 and have known
since then about the Bridas v Unocal, $15 billion interference of contract lawsuit in US
District Court, Southern District of Texas. I also know about the Fifth Circuit Court of
Appeals decision on September 9, 2003 that upheld the Bridas $500 million arbitration
settlement and the March 22, 2004 denial of Writ of Certiorari at the United States
Supreme Court, Case 03-1018, Turkmenneft v Bridas."

14.

From "Fresh Memories of War" by Kandea Mosley, The Ithaca Journal (New
York), 25 May 2002:

"We were told there were no friendly forces," said [Army Private Matt] Guckenheimer, an
assistant gunner with the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum. "If there was anybody
there, they were the enemy. We were told specifically that if there were women and
children to kill them."

15.

Quote from "A Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial Bombing of
Afghanistan: A Comprehensive Accounting"

by Professor Marc W. Herold Ph.D., M.B.A., B.Sc.
Departments of Economics and Women's Studies McConnell Hall
Whittemore School of Business & Economics University of New Hampshire

When U.S warplanes strafed [with AC-130 gunships] the farming village of Chowkar-
Karez, 25 miles north of Kandahar on October 22-23rd,killing at least 93 civilians, a
Pentagon official said, "the people there are dead because we wanted them dead." The
reason? They sympathized with the Taliban.1 When asked about the Chowkar incident,
Rumsfeld replied, "I cannot deal with that particular village."

16.

US TROOPS ADMIT SHOOTING IRAQI CIVILIANS
http://www.veteransforpeace.org/us_roops_admit_061903.htm

"American troops today admitted they routinely gun down Iraqi civilians - some of whom
are entirely innocent.

And in an admission that directly contrasts with the line coming out from the Pentagon's
spin doctors Specialist Corporal Michael Richardson added: "There was no dilemma
when it came to shooting people who were not in uniform, I just pulled the trigger."

The Crown would argue this issue isn’t in her jurisdiction, however, it is in mine as a
expressive communicator fighting for freedom from real tyranny. An irrational tyranny
that only stands exercised by corporate "news bite" censorship, and false imprisonments.
An American Prosecutor put Sergeant Benderman in prison for refusing to kill God’s
children. Now, what do you really think America would do, if "they" knew that too?

17.

Bush demands total impunity on the war crimes he is personally responsible for

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/oct2002/icc-o12.shtml

18.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FD57CF75-62E8-4C43-BF2D-2D0F0F89437B.htm

"Marines said the men fired on them. A senior officer said they had no weapons, but that
with shots coming in the men were legitimate targets because they ran."

19.

http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=1872

CAIR also wants the Pentagon to investigate a photograph circulating the Internet of two
Iraqi boys and a U.S. soldier. A smiling soldier stands besides the two boys who are
giving a "thumbs up" sign, as one of boys holds a sign written in English that reads, "Lcpl
Boudreaux killed my Dad, th[en] he knocked up my sister!"

(Link to photo: http://www.cair-net.org/images/lcpl11.jpg)

20.

Guardian Wednesday 7, 2001 - "FBI claims bin Laden inquiry was frustrated"
[this story was on Bush’s top secret W199i directive]

This information would take a well paid intelligence officer, or CBC reporter no more that
thirty seconds to look for follow ups. For, I know, the BBC did also a national news
report on it.

21.

INTERVIEWER: Are you aware that this tank is contaminated with radiation?

SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive.

INTERVIEWER: But we have measured it.

SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive, not this tank.

"Basra is on a river," he noted. "A DU shell poisons the water in a river. It poisons the
grasses and the grains. It sinks into the ground and poisons the water table. When it gets
into the body, it does incredible damage. The combination of radioactivity and heavy
metal toxicity is such that it affects the DNA in such a way that you get genetic
alterations."

[thousands of tons of measured radio-active toxic waste, heavy metals, oxidized to
microscopic particles as small as a tenth of a micron have been deposited in our airspace,
however, CBC and CNN have refused to inform ourselves on the scientifically measurable
extremely serious health concern issue..]

22.

Justice Department lawyer John Yoo, "In the exercise of his plenary power to use military
force," Yoo insisted, "the President's decisions are for him alone and are unreviewable."
Yoo was also quoted recently on CBC national news report regarding the torturing of
innocent people to death, to state something like "President Bush doesn’t have to justify
his opinions to Canada or even to the United States for that matter."

23.

The incriminating FBI email dated 22 May 2004, indicates that president Bush personally
signed off on certain interrogation techniques in an executive order."
(See original at http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf)

24.

U.S. deserter 'didn't want to have to kill babies'

"Mr. House will argue that American soldiers are guilty of war crimes and that forcing
Mr. Hinzman to fight in Iraq would have made him a war criminal.

He will call as a witness former U.S. Marine Staff Sergeant Jimmy Massey, who is
expected to testify that he and other soldiers shot more than 30 unarmed Iraqis,
including women and a six-year-old child, at a U.S. military checkpoint."

25.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45373-2004Dec7.html

that a clandestine military task force in Iraq was beating detainees, ordering Defense
Intelligence Agency debriefers out of the room during questioning, confiscating evidence
of the abuse and intimidating the debriefers when they complained."

26.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/printer_121004W.shtml

A sacked CIA official is reportedly suing the agency for allegedly retaliating against him
for refusing to falsify his reports on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to support the
White House's pre-war position.

27.

``I was faced with being deployed to Iraq to do what the infantry does, kill people, and I
had no justification for doing so,'' he testified. ``This was a criminal war. Any act of
violence in an unjustified conflict is an atrocity.''

28.

Williams's squad stopped a dump truck, and an Iraqi climbed out. "Light him up!" the
sergeant ordered, according to testimony, and the squad opened fire, killing the unarmed
man. Williams and a squadmate reportedly got into an argument over which of them had
scored Company C's first kill.

29.

It gets worse. We already knew about the Franklin County, Ohio, precinct that tallied
4,258 votes for Bush when only 638 people had actually voted.

30.

http://middleeastinfo.org/forum4970
http://wallofhate.com

Israeli Soldiers Going In For The Kill: A 13 year old Palestinian [JEWISH] school girl is
about to die

"It's a little girl. She's running defensively eastwards, a girl of about 10. She's behind the
embankment, scared to death."

"Anyone who's mobile, moving in the zone, even if it's a three-year-old, needs to be
killed."

31.

US forces unleashed more than 20 air strikes and some 60 artillery rounds on Monday,
said Major Todd Desgrosseilliers. [...] An AFP reporter in the Jolan district said one
building in every 10 had been flattened. As US-led troops closed in on the neighborhood
overnight, at least four 900-kilogram bombs were dropped in the city's northwest.

[destructive radius of a 900-kilogram bomb is half a kilometer, and all TRUE accounts
of death rates for Fallujah alone, a city where the population was forbidden to leave,
exceed two hundred thousand innocent souls.]

32.

The Bush Administration
In rush to defend White House, Rice trips over own words
Friday, March 26 @ 10:12:40 EST

By Walter Pincus and Dana Milbank, San Francisco Chronicle

"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim that the
White House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations against al Qaeda and
the Taliban. The CIA contradicted Rice's earlier assertion that Bush had requested a CIA
briefing in the summer of 2001 because of elevated terrorist threats. And Rice's assertion
this week that Bush had told her on Sept. 16, 2001, that "Iraq is to the side" appeared to be
contradicted by an order signed by Bush on Sept. 17 directing the Pentagon to begin
planning military options for an invasion of Iraq."

[ And...]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html

"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim that the White
House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the
Taliban."

This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through prior experiences of Muslim
fundamentalists, such as the Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to persecute
the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only needing to do, and had officially
done, was to use no evidence to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a
result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not follow the crime scene leads at the
real murder scene to nab to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret plot.

33.

Blix nor Elbaradei, nor Kofi, suggested, implied, or stated, that Iraq had failed to
comply with the newest U.N. resolution: 1441.

HANS BLIX: "And at this juncture, we are able to perform professional no-notice
inspections all over Iraq and to increase aerial surveillance..."

With complete, one hundred percent access to go where ever the Bush Administration
pleased without delay, left a situation of an unjust war only detrimental to an ability to
bring about any good or better thing. American soldiers are being sacrificed for no better
good or reason understood, for if progress will ever be made, it will be when they work to
bring about a political situation that was there in Iraq before the Bush Administration
starting murdering innocent people for nothing . Well, not completely, for Bremer shipped
19 billion to Greenspan early on, then, hundreds of millions were sent back.

34.

Professor Steven E. Jones, a tenured BYU professor, went public several weeks ago after
releasing a 19 page academic paper, essentially showing how the laws of physics do not
support the WTC's freefall and, consequently, the official government story.
It should be known that World Trade Center Building Seven was not struck by an
airplane, yet fell exactly the same as the two towers.

Below both towers were found pools of molten steel, only creatable with the heating
by high explosives.

Excerpts from "Me, Art Bell, and 9-11 by Lisa Guliani"

The official version of the WTC collapses defy both Galileo's Law of Falling Bodies, and
also Isaac Newton's First Law of Motion.

..if we know that hydrocarbon fires can only reach a maximum temperature of 1517
degrees Fahrenheit, how could they possibly have melted this steel, when the melting
point of steel is 2,795 degrees and the boiling point of steel (when it becomes a molten
liquid) is 5,182 degrees Fahrenheit.

The existence of these burning pools of molten steel were confirmed by:

- Mark Lorieux of Controlled Demolition, Inc
- Peter Tully, President of Tully Construction
- and the American Free Press newspaper

35.

"To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent to have
suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11..."

Tony Blair Speaking To House of Commons Liaison Committee

36.

The Washington Post, 23 September 2001.

At American urging, Ahmed traveled ... to Kandahar, Afghanistan. There he delivered the
bluntest of demands. Turn over bin Laden without conditions, he told Taliban leader
Mohammad Omar, or face certain war with the United States and its allies.

Mahmoud's meetings on two separate missions with the Taliban were reported as a
"failure." Yet this "failure" to extradite Osama without providing a shred of eidence was
part of Washington's documented design, providing a pretext for a military intervention
which was already in the pipeline. If Osama had been extradited, the main justification for
waging a war "against international terrorism" would no longer hold. Nor would the ready
to go Patriot Act. Incidentally, when MSNBC contacted the Whitehouse regarding the top
secret invasion of Afghanistan plan, it was confessed that the plan had been "fully
implemented"

38.

"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country
who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along,
whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist
dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the
leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and
denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger." --
Hermann Goering, Nazi leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II

39.

On the wall of the National Holocaust Museum: " Thou shall not be a victim, thou shall
not be a perpetrator, and thou shall not be a by-stander"

SWORN before me
in the City of Winnipeg,
Province of Manitoba,

[this affidavit was sworn in federally and provincially as a massive
Canadian Constitutional challenge]

----------------

THE QUEEN'S BENCH

WINNIPEG CENTRE

NOTICE OF MOTION

For an Order of Production

BETWEEN:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,

and

JOHNNY WIZARD

Accused.

This Notice of Motion regarding an Order of Production is to have disclosed to
the defense, the complete evidence without undue hindrance, evidence the Crown
holds against the accused as a member of our public. These following
arguments are the reasons why Justice must prevail in these proceedings:

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 7. "No person shall be
deprived of life, liberty or security of the person except in accordance with
the principles of fundamental justice."

R. v. Stinchcombe "[...] counsel for the Crown is under a general duty to
disclose all relevant information."

In R. v. Stinchcombe, the Supreme Court of Canada held once again, as any
legitimate Court of any land would, that the accused in criminal cases has a
Constitutional right to full and complete disclosure of the Crown's case.
Yet, in the criminal case involving myself, the Crown's refusal to return my
legal property [such as including my actual expressions] is motivated by
contempt for fundamental justice - for true accountability - by intentionally
working to deceive our Courts through denying the evidence of one: the charge
against me is truly fraudulent under our law as it stands currently, and two:
that I don't already have the silent moral support of every honorable top
secret intelligence officer this world over.

Canada's "Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in
Relation to Maher Arar"

"The RCMP notes that because national security investigations are criminal
investigations, the possibility of judicial scrutiny always exists and the
presence of this possibility acts as an indirect accountability mechanism."
[Maher Arar was an innocent Canadian tortured and left for murdered by the
irrational as criminal pro-bush forces negatively influencing Canadian
jurisprudence.]

Firstly, I, like any, need ready easy access to all the evidence the Crown
holds against myself, to indicate a possibly hidden motive behind her criminal
allegations. For it is in our authority as a free society that the Crown
holds any legitimacy.

It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust Crown on not giving
me ready easy access to the evidence, but for only by hugely limiting degrees
that include costly bus rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of
thousands of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls.

I need to provide the evidence of my actual expressions to counter balance the
false interpretations the Crown alleges, when it comes to asking where
specifically the rights of a child are being compromised when she makes her
defined as sexually dysfunctional inferences. All the images on my computer,
deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions. Similarly, are all the written
texts on my computer those of words I hold to be my own personal philosophy.
As indicated by the Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe case, a defense against
fraudulent accusations regarding the Rights of our children being compromised,
can be readily addressed early on by understanding the possession charge in
relative context to the personal life of the accused.

R. v. Sharpe

"Section 163.1(6) creates a further defence for material that serves an
"educational, scientific or medical purpose". This refers to the purpose the
material, viewed objectively, may serve, not the purpose for which the
possessor actually holds it."

So, purpose of digital media as determined illegal must therefore, be backed
firstly by criminal intent, for without any intent you have no purpose. A
defense is made available by the Sharpe decision on personalprofessional
conduct to indicate actual established purpose of accused to prevent blind
"overreaching". The Supreme Court of Canada's deep concerns of "overreaching"
are very much apparent in my particular criminal matter. Conduct of
individuals who have lost their purpose in Police keeping, who aren't being
managed to express through our Police actions, a public interest in where the
"offensable" images are coming from, or came, but instead, where it's all
going as potential new innocent porno victims with millions of dollars worth
of stuff they can get away stealing. [I've read porno cops in America
recently acquired 300,000 more American names of households to raid, off of
one single server found managed in violation, but have taken a pause before
then moving on to arrest anybody who has ever used the internet for whatever,
to consider, just what have we gotten ourselves into here.] See, perfectly
legal imagery can be made into illegal thoughts relatively quickly by the
weaker irrationals that exist within our police services. Where, to prove for
the record, a twenty two year old is only twelve, even when she has in her
possession all her proper paperwork, completed puberty, a living mother, a
popular working web site and historical documentations, is just foolishly
impossible. While at Your end Mr. Surfer Citizen, your demonized guilty,
until proven innocent of thinking their faulting criminal perceptions, they do
practically nothing to verify. Without needing to establish intent, they make
off like bandits. See, under a simple possession charge, there is no
allegations of intent to obtain or distribute something illegal, and likewise,
not found a responsible public's interest in seeking the means of which the
criminal content was as could be LEGALLY provided. The last thing we want in
our dying world is a setup where private legal businesses are selling,
promoting, and releasing content that only becomes illegal when the
exploitation unit comes into your home to steal your stuff by grossly
misunderstanding what the threat actually is.

By exercising our right to perceive representations of that which is made
freely available, is of in itself, important to the sociologist, psychologist,
concerned parent, and of course, the conceptualizing artist reflecting on our
shared reality.

My private and public expressions are more tuned to those who are personally
responsible in escaping arrest for running death squads against innocent
children in Afghanistan financed by the undefended as uniformed American tax
paying Public, [10th Mountain Division] a criminal enterprise still cashing in
on the rewards of bush's mass murder campaigns. Or, the dropping of cluster
dud land mines throughout residential school districts to murder our children
indiscriminately. Mercury tainted vaccines that for sure cause irreparable
damage to North American children, or as currently, about John DeCamp's just
released updated 2005 edition, about the secret White House-linked national
child sex-ring entitled "The Franklin Cover-up." However, the real motivating
factor [intent] in the Crown's purpose by attempting to pirate our public's
right to defend Ourselves judiciously, is more specifically because I
articulate the HONORABLE FBI's official publicly available findings on who
orchestrated, and funded the crimes of 911. Namely, Mr. Bush Jnr. along
with his business partner, the still escaping Lieutenant General Mahmoud
Ahmad.

[University of Ottawa Professor Michel Chossudovsky, has researched the
Ahmad/Bush relationship as documented by CNN ABC et al, and can be quested for
at http://www.globalresearch.ca]

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html
http://www.prisonplanet.com/new_revelations_on_911.htm

The Crown to not fight on our behalf regarding this easily verifiable mass
murder issue, is indicative of an intention, to cast aside the concern of all
children who benefit from my communicating higher truths for the betterment of
the entire public body. I ask our Court, who, in Canada, informs our public
truthfully as I do, that the "scumbags" Canada's own General Hillier is
referring to get Canadian youths for sure killed over in his nationally
broadcasted barbaric adolescent bigotry, against all the INNOCENT students of
Afghanistan, is of a People who factually opened up schools for girls under
the Taliban's getting better through communicating leadership?, and who
outlawed Bush's heroin production, and the slavery and rape of women? Women
who were when working at the Taliban's newspaper, were not required to wear
burkas despite CBC's propaganda to the contrary? The Crown would suggest her
ignorance on such subjects is irrelevant to her case against me, for those
children's lives, and others like them, are not who she is working to protect.
So, where I demand is a crime against our real God occurring I ask the hiding
in darkness Crown to explain herself publicly in the light of these
proceedings to our Honorable Lord.

The Crown's case argues that a determined selection of legal images, can be
sited under a labeled classification of "collateral images", as somehow, unto
it's separated self, being an indicator, or summation of my unbridled
character. Therefor, to question such interpretations I need the luxury and
comforts of a stress free environment to ponder the significant meaning of
each of these collateral damages against ourselves as the innocent the Crown
argues for as a weapon of Justice. For, those personally responsible for
making repeatedly easily verifiable faulting expressions with the evidence the
Crown refuses to return to me as my legal property, are in all likelihood,
still blabbering corporately un-accosted, the completely blind support of
indiscriminate mass murder in thoughtless praise for war criminal traitor to
Humanity George Bush Jr., their supreme no nothing about squat leader. While
myself, am a well documented public defender of children's rights and a
studious observant researcher on media matters, who is schooled in the
field(s) of Psychology and Genetics, Sexuality and Religion, along with the
chaotic order to the indivisible nature of life ourselves. [And who when not
terribly busy building this needed defense against the Crown's alleged
criminality, still champion the written word for Justice being - US all as
treated fairly.]]

I also need to show, how I come to be in possession of another's expressions,
of some managed images, or some strewn texts.

It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust Crown on not giving
me ready easy access to the evidence, but for only by hugely limiting degrees
that include costly bus rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of
thousands of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls. While sitting
just outside my police door, could be the public accuser who professes proudly
the deeply ignorant ungodly beliefs of cop killing and heroin dealing to push
US all over the top with Bush as it's global mastermind. Knowing such an
enemy of freedom who taunts all our judicial matters with true personal self
contempt, is there still escaping public ridicule, wearing our community's
Police Officer uniform, could create unto itself, an unneeded frustration on
my part, for, I am a honorable defender to all that is Just. A honorable
defender that is needing by threat of false imprisonment to concentrate on
Justice for just myself personally currently. As the Court well knows, a
bushite's favored public intent is well established by the evidence, as
documented truly criminal being the ungodly. [Hypnotized lawless through the
mechanics of suggestion I would diagnose for the don't know knowing any
better.] There exists no evidence against bin Laden for 911, nor, was any
factually alleged to exist, and despite what Bush broadcasts unchallenged
nationally on our airwaves privately, Saddam did actually let the inspectors
in to go where ever they wanted without delay. Furthermore, indiscriminately
murdering people with tens of thousands of cluster dud land mines, 9000
missiles targeting public infrastructure, many multiple 2000 pound bombs
containing radio-active toxic waste, along with the new and improved napalm
and phosphorous poison gas clouds all because we are in the approximate age
range of 15 to 55 is a for sure real war crime going unaddressed publicly by
the Crown, but not by myself. So, the Crown's interest is in jeopardizing the
lives of our children for sure by working to silence my extremely rare public
cries for true accountability here in Winnipeg.

I am sworn to protect all as indicated by my recorded actions and praised
world wide word. The National Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe decision
allows this defense to be made on our behalf.

By Our Honorable Court's "Lord" siding to support claims made by my false
accusers - as the running definitive summation of what can be claimed as
"collateral images" - [legal relative media content present on my computer,]
while judging to refuse to have returned my therefore stolen legal property so
I can adequately prepare a counter defense against the Crown's confusions, is
nothing short of a crime in progress. At least it should be. By denying me
the evidence the Crown holds in contempt of our Court, would create an undue
hardship on my, seeking to illuminate the facts from our vantage points.
Having to travel back and forth across the city to view hundreds of thousands
of media messages pertinent to my case at hand, left denied search tools, and
a comfortable atmosphere, is unduly unfair for all concerned. Now, I know, I
have to deal personally with those who support such a criminal ungodly nature
when I have no choice to, but to have them located in the same listening
vicinity throughout all my inquiries on stolen legal media content, to spew
their boastful chauvinistic fascist state partiality of how great George W.
Bush is as their master thinking celebrated American Cop Killer, would leave
me unfairly tensioned. I need the meditative comforts of home study with good
coffee and private friends to ponder my adroit, to the point defense with the
evidence I demand the fair right to contend.

I hold children's rights paramount in the public defense stands I've made for
near a decade, and privately, I'm free to think my way on anything. The Crown
has no right to dictate what my private thoughts are, especially, if I'm not
granted to speak on her conclusions with the ready made evidence she don't
want me to have returned possession of. My legal property that the Crown's
crew has plans to sell! God, are you listening?

I need the luxury of computer processing that the Crown used to surmise her
relative faulting judgment of my worth to our society.

I need returned all my legal possessions, like my real expressions such as
public communications, to fairly challenge the Crown's refusal to consider
such objectiveness on who the one holding criminal intent actually is on this
serious matter. So therefore, the Crown's crew should not be allowed by our
law to sell my stolen property as they are planning, while surely as
sadomasochists, destroying a life time of my written works they know mean a
great deal to me personally. Wishing to deprive our rights as the community,
to be granted fair treatment in our Court systems of accountability, is surely
what will happen if our Honorable Judge does not Judge honorably against the
Crown and grant me the legal return of my stolen property. I need to
establish the mechanics of my specifically unique computer system, so I can
establish my fair defense made available by the Supreme Court of Canada's
Standing Sharpe decision.

The Court recognizes finding that all declared illegal possessions serve a
criminal purpose without any intent, unless found serving otherwise by made
available evidence from the defense. [ergo my Constitutional challenge]
Evidence of real purpose the Crown doesn't want to grant our Court, because
usually, guilty or innocent, they do sell everybody's stolen stuff actually.
And truly, the Crown has expressed no interest in assisting our Police
agencies in apprehending those known responsible by the evidence for first
degree mass murders. [Instead, pick on the helpless innocent little Jewish
man bearing a cross, as cowardly brown shirt jack boot nazi fascists under
Hitler would have too. [surprising for many, it is formally illegal to be
Jewish currently in God's Israel. As for the Crowns in my case, and the
Judge, well they seem to be not all that bad over all. [So far... But this
innocent people go to prison for speaking un-contended truths thing for me is
just some extreme to the core serious business of ours, and good or bad, the
Judges, and the Crowns, and the Police Officers have a paid job to do by
following the rules designed ultimately in purpose to protect both me and you.
So, can't we all just find a way to get our public news agencies to live up to
our responsibilities by recognizing standing laws not yet enforced against the
un-elected dictator, the monstrous war mongering American traitor criminal,
911's George Bush Jnr., instead of present company???]]]

I need returned my 37,333 [minus the contended for argument] images to
sensibly consider their feasibility to collectively represent the Crown's
faulting illogical argument in a brighter picture.

I need to show what I did with obtained media information on general terms by
mechanical processing through my very specific as unique operating systems,
and through my definitive writing on the very subject we are here considering.
I need operating script batch programs that do specific tasks regarding
general media managements.

I need to show how Usenet [early raw based sub-internet knowledge sharing
web communications system] is used, and how it was legally accessed by my
specific personal system, granting me, to be a part of one of the greatest
collected artistic expressions of the known world. And how, when using such
services, informations aren't found perceived until, at the very least, they
are already in one's possession, thereby making the Crown's standing
accusation absent criminal intent clearly unjust. [those responsible for
distribution/expression of actual for real illegal depictions are where the
infraction against the public's interest can be compromised, but the
exploitation units I'm aware of seem to have little of no financial interest
in recognizing such a wanting to lose their lucrative industry brokered
through what should be worked to be made into redundancy.]

I need returned possession of my computer content, to seek for indicative
examples of huge disparities with what is described with the Crown's own
relative definitions, and what my media machine actually contains regarding my
for real expressions. I need to reference my personal writings surmising the
faulting state of the child porn policing industry. To surmise grand totals,
as such the Crown's crew alleges of legal content she'll bemoan despairingly
of collateral damages against us as innocence. Knock knock knock.

If the Crown argues falsely that the evidence I request is irrelevant to her
criminal case, then what could the harm be honestly in showing the error of
her ways? If she argues it jeopardizes to expose the true criminality used to
try convicting me, an innocent honorable man in Our name, I would move that
the charge against me be stayed, my property returned, and the Courts help me
make a Constitutional challenge to the validity of the law, while
communicating also Your dissatisfaction in not having us heard speaking out
nationally for the truly Honorable FBI - against 911's true money man -
Lieutenant General Mahmoud Ahmad - getting away as bush's not so secret any
longer private business partner, escaping he is from the mass murder of
thousands of our good friends, the still left undefended corporate Americans.

I need to know what settings were set in place for the installed programs to
access the internet. And a whole bunch else besides.

In conclusion, I need to show where my outstanding character was at, by
indicating exactly what I spent my free time on, to illustrate for our Court,
my TRUE intent as motive on this matter.

Yours truly,

JOHNNY WIZARD

------------------------------------

THE QUEEN'S BENCH

WINNIPEG CENTRE

NOTICE OF MOTION

for the Crown to Stay Proceedings

BETWEEN:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,

and

JOHNNY WIZARD

Accused.

The Validity of the Law

While true, to distribute material in an abusive form of sexually explicit
child pornography, can have a detrimental impact on the impressionable, being
in simple possession, does not connotate the same negative risk to the public
body. It is not a Freedom of Expression issue. All the pictures on my
computer, deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions. Nor, importantly,
can digital images be perceived, until, at least, they are already in your
possession. Under current law, as is in my case, you're already guilty on
nothing. So, if you should see something arguably imprisoning, you're too
late to point fingers elsewhere.

It's analogous to you sitting in your parked car with someone throwing through
the opened window, a closed paper bag of crack cocaine, followed behind by an
arresting police officer, who while cuffing you hears your plead that some
completely unknown person threw the innocuous unmarked bag through the window,
leaving the unjust officer of our law, to reply for the record "Yeah, I saw
the, left to go on his own "stranger" do it. And it's a crime in this country
don't you know to be found in simple possession? Now, where are the keys to
the trunk of this fancy car I'm planning to sell for a tidy profit crack head
loser?"

The Crown appears under this law in my case to have no need to prove a
criminal intent to do her things.

See, under a simple possession charge, there is no allegations of intent to
obtain or distribute something illegal, and likewise, not found a responsible
public's interest in seeking the means of which the criminal content was as
could be LEGALLY distributed. The last thing we want in our dying world is a
setup where private legal businesses are selling, promoting, and releasing
content that only becomes illegal when the exploitation unit comes into your
home under false pretences to steal all your electronic stuff by grossly
misunderstanding what the threat actually is.

A digital image isn't possibly perceived until it is at least, already in your
possession. Making the standing law as it is interpreted by the faulting
Crown, unjust. No criminal intent is alleged by my sole possession charge,
but for by myself against the Crown's secret bushite crew for aiding and
abetting the crimes of first degree mass murder in New York City.

An infraction against the public's interest occurs when such materials are
expressed through distribution. Digital images of people posing as testaments
to the beauty of being human, are not the same as expressions of sexually
exploited children. Yet, from as near as I can tell, the threat of seriously
cruel and inhuman treatment against me with a five year prison sentence is
being made because the Crown has made included, condemnable interpretations of
the public's free expressions of youth and beauty. Again, not my own.
Leaving still no made interest in understanding where these prison term
perceptions, that are often admitted by the Crown's crew to be legal,
originated. If the Crown's case remains standing, why shouldn't we expect the
child exploitation units to then widely distribute as near as can be Barely
Legal materials in hopes to nab more of us as the fearful to be shamed as
criminal through threatened public Court proceedings regarding your alledged
deviant private sexual thoughts? Of legal images perceived as a god honest,
testimony of youth and beauty, being ourselves beautifully youthful, could
leave you too as depicted hiding some unknown something about your unseen
character. Or, an even worse madness, exploitation units distributing truly
illegal depictions, named maybe after car models, to see who could be made
found only in simple possession of the accusers relative perception?

For, if the internationally popular woman depicted was well over eighteen and
had her own legal website, don't matter for indictment, cause the expert of
expert experts they have in my case, a double full time professional computer
porno viewer, states with a complete straight face, the full figured pubic
wisped woman, he knows nothing of, is really only ten or twelve. You're for
sure either normal being human, or guilty of thinking their bad thoughts
punishable with real prison sentences. As a result of course, I'm now
demanded to divorce my life of other critically important responsibilities, to
prove my complete innocence on these deliberately planned top secret schemes,
they didn't want You, the public to know of. A near criminal attempt, (as
documented by the now disclosed once top secret warrant), to silence my cries
for the arrest of the publicly established factual 911 masterminds - Our Mr.
bush Jr., General Ahmad, rumsfeld, myers and cheney, along with almost the
entire senior staff of disclosed as flagrantly criminal propaganda
proliferators, The Office of Special Plans.

The Warrant details by exclusion, a deliberate top secret plan on the Crown's
part, a deviant anti-government plan to silence my calls for accountability
through my world wide public addresses on the FBI answers still surrounding
the murder of thousands of American Citizens. The Crown, as an attempt to
undermine Liberty by thwarting me off my one chosen career path of Universal
Speaker, and fictionalized demon slayer - leaves you instead, this quickly
passing opportunity to stand up for the rights of another being cheated for
real, and in so doing, we'll find together, that true freedom is justice for
US all. Law stands strong for good reason, so too, does tyranny rule by
censorship for false imprisonment. Do not allow my voice for freedom's reign
to be silenced unjustly, by those who would have us falsely believe, Bush
personally didn't do the crimes we all easily now know the evidence of.

An unjust Law enslaves all Religions, for reason is beautifully Just through
your will to conceive, that God's interests are as naturally too, your own
included. My commitments to equal rights for all have never changed, and
Humanity's true commitment to defend Iraqi children to the last cowardly
murderous thieving bushite enemy, will carry on, despite the corrupted Crown's
attempt to stop real Justice from continuing. When one views public
photographs of rumsfeld's un-arrested mercenary soldiers raping an Iraqi
woman, are our rights being further violated with every passing witness? How
about witnessing that Guantanamo's torture victim Moazzam Begg, was running a
girl's school program with his wife under the female loving Taliban? [You
know, Moazzam Begg, the one and same British Citizen depicted solely by heroin
pushing donald "sexy cluster dud land mine dropper" rumsfeld, as one of our
Lord's most dangerous criminals?]

The Crown alleges in truly contemptuous silence, she's not interested in
defending the rights of those children, or victims of mass murder, while
voicing publicly in Our Court, that I, am infringing on the rights of children
somewhere else because, even though no body is perceiving the data located
anywhere on my hard drive, it still magically constitutes a personal
violation, on its own by itself, of an unjust law that others have been
demonized, robbed, then falsely imprisoned on. This irrational demand on
behalf of the Crown to Your Court, where she states her private viewings do
not infringe on children's rights, while EVERYONE else's does somehow, even if
you didn't see at all the picture judged as the reflecting mind of a true
sexual deviant, is US ALL being the auto-guilty anyway, and not firstly
innocent as it should be. See, the Judge could say to a Jury, "Your job is
not to judge the injustice committed with these blind and broken laws, but
that solely, did Top Cop Johnny have this one single picture on his computer?,
and if he did, then the bushite liars who fight our systems of accountability
through Justice to further escape real rapists, torturers, and documented
treasonous war criminals like those who for sure committed 911, get to put him
in Our prison for half a decade."

However this issue requires much for further study. It turns out my two
primary accusing officers who deal with real sicko child porn every day full
time, also support death squads against innocent families in Afghanistan to
protect the demon lies of George W. Bush, and they'd almost tell the jury
that too as blind devote disciples of the self hating bushmob cabal of neo-con
peenackers, if the Crown wasn't there to forbid the truth from being spoken.

The two abusers, the two anti-cop officers of question, lied to me, then
censored my agreement they had their word on, then, attempted to twist my
comments into something clearly I didn't mean.. and that's not even the half
of it. So, don't tell me I'm being over critical of their naked wicked evil.
If an image was an offensive act witnessed, why then is it that a genuine
concern is not with a possible victim all the time? The shocker to the
uninitiated in the battles of good against evil in these child exploitation
units, is that rarely do they have a real monetary care to follow though with
the details. - "Oh, the girl is really a woman, and the web address on the
digital image is of a server acting completely within the confines of our law,
nudist campers are nudist campers, and as for the beautifully naked young girl
taking a bubble bath smiling, er.. I mean the one looking seductive...
drat." Examples: I have many texts willfully ignored by the Crown that
articulate irrational praise for one heinous crime against God or another of
the un-elected neocon war wankers, that I, as a human, certainly don't find
myself in automatic, no free thought agreement with., right? And my objective
as Human defender isn't to censor the known criminality of the, murder
innocent people for the war profiting bushmob liars, but to expose the true
injustice committed against our better selves - US all dying slavishly
censored through Our corporate international communication network of good old
ideas left long gone dead and buried. Hammurabi's Code of Law: it's first
sentence, of his first paragraph, the number one most important Law as
example. - Here's the translation - The public figure blaming someone else
for a capital offense, such as terrorist, who uses NO EVIDENCE for PROOF, to
murder in Your name as Citizen, is the FOR SURE ENEMY, always, EVERY TIME.
And in the next four thousand years that single law has timelessly stood
unbroken, not one person has been capable to declare a true, wanting
disagreement.

The corporate news mandate is to take You for granted - without any given say
so. Our sold as sworn public defenders, CBC, CNN, et al, hold no opinions of
our Humanity on the needless indiscriminate bombing of populated cities, the
torturing of men women and children by un-arrested as openly confessed
complete psychotics, the thieving of hundreds of billions from America and
Iraq, and as such, tyrannically support [don't call us, will call you] commi
censorship, all done in to assist the "escape" of those truly responsible for
the crimes of 911.

When the Crown argues that disturbing images simply in your possession
constitute an absolute evaluation of your punishable character, while
denyingforbidding a Court to know what you do in your life with our time is
faulted. I hold children's rights paramount in the public defense stands I've
made for near a decade, and privately, I'm free to think my way on anything.
The Crown has no right to dictate what my private thoughts are. This
insistence on behalf of the Crown on what we all perceive individually by
judgment is determined solely by media content - is a foolish falsehood
forwarded by Our Great Lord's, Supreme Court of Canada. Example: Does not
the public videos of rumsfeld's, defended from YOUR LAW bushite soldiers,
gunning down women and children running for their lives from a mosque, or
where hundreds of unarmed defenseless families are huddled together, then
bombed by a bushite enemy grunt, a grunt who on VIDEO TAPE, moans itself to
orgasm when they all die as the innocent murdered with "ah.. dude" just speak
for itself? Sure, the celebrating bushies repeatedly depicted have no honor,
or courage, only a fascistic hatred for their fellow man - openly thieves who
die without a fighting cause for Freedom, nor a true commitment to Law - but I
would ask if We had a voice to cry in Your Court, what do You see in this
corporate World that leaves my stand professionally unworthy for
deliberations? The Crown's concern remains silent on the DOCUMENTED and
easily verifiable murder issues, when she has her regular huddles with a local
corporate reporter, discussing on who, from the community, was in Our court
challenging, a sexually dysfunctional sadomasochistic label. For the Crown to
witness and know first hand of such barbaric criminality, such as the true
perpetrators of 9/11 found revealed by THE FBI stinger, along with the rest of
the evidence trail that all leads directly to the Whitehouse, is a Crown who
does not hold Canadian's freedom in check, or a care for our soldier aged sons
and daughters conflicting near death. But to side instead, as they are hiding
behind the honorable Crown's position, a small group of four or five dim
blips, attempting they are to silence these calls for real freedom for the
masses. I am a proud and honorable man who objects to furthering bush's war
crime aims with this lifeless corporate tyranny of enslavement through whoring
for the dark foreboding wills of Our Mr. bush Jr.. Censorship is the tool of
tyrants, while I beckon a new light for peace by communicating. Please, I beg
you, do not allow them to silence my objections to have us unjustly
imprisoning myself, while bringing great hardship to my immediate family by
denying the truth be spoken publicly in my defense on why I'm in the Court
room, and what is documented irrespective of their spin doctoring and label
pasting.

Where is the violation of a child's rights, specifically, when the Crown's
crew gleefully ponder images she'll use to silence the words of Johnny Wizard
by prison sentence? Where? No, where?

Commanding our public indignation for those who disrespect human rights she
will use as her weapon, all the while, hidden from the jury, and the judge, a
secret contempt for thousands of innocent murder victims denied my
unchallenged demands for real Justice. No officer of our laws anywhere have
found fault with my PUBLIC summation, documented fully, on who, and how, 9/11
was truly orchestrated. A Crown stuck committed to global bushite tyranny Vs.
a Truth seeker of the highest order. Come to the trial! Tell your friends!
Tell your neighbors! The People vs. an overburdened unjust Crown, and a near
treasonous national security officer, who wrote in the original top secret
warrant nobody was suppose to see, it'd be so much easier to help bush escape
arrest by avoiding the public accountability process entirely. The once top
secret Johnny Wizard Warrant is freely available with most names being
detracted, to protect the innocent until proven guilty. A traitor to God and
Country the Crown and one National Security officer potentially is in this top
secret bush administration conspiracy endeavor, to serve by bushite criminal
decree up here in defenseless Canada. For as potential accessories to first
degree mass murder, they are stuck attempting to undermine Canada's National
Security Services, the FBI, the People, US, all to further unjustly sacrifice,
more of our uninformed sons and daughters for further bounty, as substantiated
real world criminal, bushite evils. I say no. Help me get public recognition
through talk radio, take a stand for your fellow man, and help a Jury in
Winnipeg learn of who I am, and why they are forbidden to know what's truly
going on, and you'll be helping yourself to a better future. My principle
allegations against George W. Bush require a qualified and adapt security
officer no more that forty three minutes to verify. Namely, bush's business
partner, General Ahmad funded 911's "mastermind" "ringleader" Atta, and was
also sent, the General was, from the Whitehouse on behalf of bush to the
Taliban stating, no evidence will be brought against Laden as the accused,
therefore an innocent man in Christ. And, that as MSNBC reported of the top
secret documents provided to themselves anonymously from Condoleezza Rice's
office, George had a confidential plan at his desk on how to invade
Afghanistan dated September 9th, 2001 that he didn't want anybody in America
to know he was working on during his "vacation". His confessed publicly to
MSNBC, as "fully implemented" Afghanistan strategy, demanded that he not
pursue the true 911 evil doers, for it would upset his made before hand,
guaranteed plan. That had soldier grunts moving out to get ready just before
the event. All premised on blaming Laden as a terrorist without a shred of
evidence, for a crime that hadn't yet taken place, but that bush was
personally prepared as closing investigations on. To secure criminal invasion
he would refuse to follow the evidence trail - and as a result - NOT apprehend
the have to let go - falsely accused bin Laden. [cowardly soldiers who didn't
speak up as real Patriots would have much earlier, who were ordered to let
Laden go on his way in Torra Borra, have now all mostly fallen quietly dead.,
by fluke mishap or something like the sort it is said.] All set in play, this
plan of Our Mr. bush Jr's, top secretly with General Ahmad riding gun shot,
just days before thousands of American People were still left unaccountably
murdered. See? Mr. Bush would need such an event to happen unhindered as a
requirement to galvanize world sentiment. Providing no evidence substantiated
would guarantee his needed invasion for American pension thievers Enron, and
that is exactly what HE planned, what HE did, and who HE is. Evil is the
deceived disguised. What more do you need to know buddy?

I, armed with only the facts, demand the arrest of those who participated in
the murder of children to protect the demon lies of George W. Bush, while the
Crown's case, on top of alleging th